Anand Versus Kramnik Stats

Submitted by SonofPearl on Thu, 10/09/2008 at 12:10pm.

Opinions are like belly-buttons.  Everyone has one.  Some people think Vishy Anand will successfully defend his title against Vladimir Kramnik; others think that Kramnik will overcome the Indian champion.

But what about the facts?  What do the actual stats say?

Anand and Kramnik have played each other 51 times at 'classical' time controls, and the results?  Kramnik wins 6, Anand 4 and the rest drawn.

So does that mean that Kramnik has an edge?  It's probably too close a result to be significant (Garry Kasparov, for example, had an overwhelming record against Anand of 23 wins and just 8 losses.  To be fair to Anand, Garry had an overwhelming record against most people!).

What about rapid games?  Anand has a reputation as a strong rapid player, so is this borne out by the stats?  Of the 46 rapid games the pair have played, Anand has won 10 and Kramnik just 2.  Therefore, it seems accurate to say that if the match goes to rapid playoffs, Anand will be favourite.

What about Blitz games?  There have only been 8, with the players sharing 2 wins apiece.  Let's hope the fate of the World Championship doesn't come down to such a lottery...

Whoever you think will win, most pundits and fans are predicting a close contest.  Let's hope for some great chess along the way!

Here are two of the decisive games at classical time controls.  The first sees Kramnik slowly grinding Anand into submission using his favourite Catalan Opening.  The second shows Kramnik blundering into an embarrassingly quick loss.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by vijayam55 - 51 days ago
hyderabad India
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1

!!!!!!!!!Ananad is the best

by ShahidAnwer - 51 days ago
Lahore Pakistan
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 108

I think Anand will be able to defeat Kramnik.

by tirant - 51 days ago
hospitalet International
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 26

Perhaps is better anand but i want kramnik to win. And will see whos better Go Kramnik!!!

by Magikstone - 51 days ago
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 40

kramnik is known for moves that not even an amateur would make.  and yet this guy has become champion.  we've all seen how topalov won in a match by a very unsound knight sacrifice that most of us would have been able to defend.  it seems kramnik loses confidence in positions that are totally new to him.  i consider anand to be the more universal player, better calculating ability and more creative repertoire.  the first game he lost because his idea of his queen on a8 was highly flawed.  however if anand plays in such a way where his ideas have a strong bite to them and is able to keep kramnik on his toes where he has to fight for a draw, then anand is clearly going to win.  or, if anand plays careful chess  and is content with simple drawish positions, anand will lose the same way leko did against kramnik

by SonofPearl - 52 days ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 3841

kco - details of all their games can found here.

by argorytmo - 52 days ago
San Nicolás de los Garza Mexico
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1

I will place my bets on Anand, disregard the last results between those two, I think Anand's play is more robust and practical, but alas, hopefully it will be a spectacular battle on the blood-less war sport called chess, Cheers!!!

by kco - 52 days ago
Perth Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 2246

@ SonofPearl, what was the results in the last 10 matches between them. (classical ) ?

by jeremain - 52 days ago
Gen. Santos Philippines
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 8

Anand is no question, a great GM. But Kramnick is better in terms of "much-play" especially in a classical game format.Tongue out 

by chawil - 52 days ago
Lowestoft, Suffolk United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 284

Re the second Anand - Kramnik, how refreshing to see a GM blatantly hanging a piece! Gives hope for us all. And didn't anyone ever tell K that "Knight on the rim leads to trim."?

by Artemi - 52 days ago
Imus, Cavite Philippines
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 90

Anand will win!!!

by brandonQDSH - 52 days ago
Honolulu, HI United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 184

What a 2nd game WOW :))

I wish I could force grandmasters to hang pieces in 20 turns!!

by shannz - 52 days ago
nelson New Zealand
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 5

game two i wish i could blunder like kramnik =} .the first game was a ripper.i hope the indians can break the russsians strong hold on chess,with kasparov out of the way kramnik is there main hope,go india!!!!.

by Oldtimer - 52 days ago
Watauga, TX United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 17

I remember reading somewhere that David Bronstein got to daydreaming in his world championship match and blundered away the championship. I'm glad I'm in good company!

by shuttlechess92 - 52 days ago
California United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 942

I love that first game

by Phobetor - 52 days ago
Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 725

Kramnik is also famous for another big blunder he made...

by figrock - 52 days ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 802

Everyone blunders, it's just that grandmasters blunder less.

by DaBear - 52 days ago
Copenhagen Denmark
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 24

And Kramnik had to take the pawn because the queen had no other safe squares.

18...Qd3?? is just a big blunder.

by staggerlee - 52 days ago
Kansas United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 472

Kramnik brings the brutality.  Of course, it looks as though if Anand can manage to draw and stay even if necessary and bring the match down to rapid tie-breakers, he should be able to keep the crown.  I'm so excited to see what happens!

by darkseed - 52 days ago
central Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 2

if kramnik can loose like the second game, then anything is possible..

by SonofPearl - 52 days ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 3841

In the second game black is going to lose either his knight on a5 or his bishop on f5 which are both attacked by the white rook on e5.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.