Spielmann Could Spiel

Submitted by GreenLaser on Fri, 11/07/2008 at 8:26pm.

Rudolf Spielmann (1883-1942) was a great player whose book, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess," has become a classic. He described the types of sacrifices and the conditions required for each. He practiced what he preached while winning dozens of tournaments and earned the titles "Master of Attack" and "Last Knight of the King's Gambit." He had an even score against Jose Capablanca with 2 wins, 8 draws, and 2 losses. Spielmann had to flee from his native country, Austria, to escape from the Nazis. Milan Vidmar Sr. (1885-1962) was born in Ljubljana which was then in Austria-Hungary and is now in Slovenia. He was a professional electrical engineer. After a career as a top player, despite being an amateur, he was awarded the title of grandmaster in 1950. The following game between Spielmann and Vidmar was played in Semmering, Austria in 1926. Spielmann came in first with 10 wins, 6 draws, and 1 loss for a total of 13 points out of 17. Vidmar came in third with 9 wins, 6 draws, and 2 losses scoring 12 points. Alekhine, with 12.5 points came in second. Vidmar beat Alekhine while Spielmann and Alekhine had a draw.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by NM GreenLaser - 57 days ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 881

pythagoras, I did not infer what you did not imply. I understood you to mean that Spielmann played in an era of great players. I just used your comment to add information about the tournament the game was from. Four of the six players you mentioned were there. The standings were:

  1.  Spielmann 13
  2. Alekhine 12.5
  3. Vidmar 12
  4. Nimzowitsch 11.5
  5. Tartakower 11.5
  6. Rubinstein 10
  7. Tarrasch 10
  8. Reti 9.5
  9. Gruenfeld 9
  10. Janowski 8.5
  11. Treybal 8
  12. Vajda 7.5
  13. Yates 7
  14. Gilg 6 (drew with Spielmann and beat Alekhine)
  15. Kmoch 6
  16. Davidson 5.5
  17. Michel 4.5
  18. Rosselli del Turco 1
by pythagoras - 57 days ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 10

Greenlaser,

I didn't mean to imply that all of those players were at that tournament. I was talking about Spielmann in general and the fact that he was so successful playing risky, sharp positions in probably the richest period in chess history.

Nice article.

by NM GreenLaser - 58 days ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 881

chawil, 14...Be6 15.Qh5 must be what you mean by 14...Bd6 15.Qh4 (just to help readers). Nothing helps Black at this point. Fritz agrees that White is about 3 to 5 ahead. I believe Black is already lost by move 13.

pythagoras, of the players you named, Capa and Lasker were not at Semmering. Spielmann had draws with Alekhine, Reti, and Tarrasch. He beat Nimzowitsch and lost to Rubinstein. Yes, Spielmann, who was Jewish, died poor in Sweden after escaping from the Nazis. About 13 months later, the Danes helped Danish Jews escape to Sweden. A Nazi plan to round up Jews in Denmark was thus foiled. Readers may find a book called "Rescue in Denmark." The Nazis wrote about "Jewish chess" and "Aryan chess." If I had that "literature," I would check to see how they accounted for "Spielmann chess." Sorry for a political observation, but this divisive thinking is used by radical feminists who identify male and female thinking as different.  Male thinking is called hierarchical. The process of objectification uses language to treat people as objects. It creates an in-group and an out-group. It could be the Marxist categories of capitalists and proletariat. This class struggle model is used whether the groups are class, sex, ethnicity, or other. "Enemy of the people" is a term used for hundreds of years. Curious readers may research this on their own. Hopefully, back to chess to enjoy and to escape.

by pythagoras - 58 days ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 10

Spielmann is one of my favorite players. At his best, he is a beautiful tactician who skillfully navigates complex positions to find beautiful moves. At his worst, he's a man out of his era getting punished by more sound play. Still, it takes a tremendous amount of courage to constantly play positions that are very sharp especially since he played in the greatest chess period against heroes such as Capablanca, Lasker, Alekhine, Reti, Tarrasch and Nimzowitsch. Whew, I can't imagine sitting across from Alekhine and breaking out the Danish Gambit! That would take a certain kind of crazy.

And despite this, his record against these giants was pretty good. Truth be told, he also played a lot of conventional/acceptable openings (which were not always his choosing) such as the French, Queen's Pawn and the Sicilian...and he played positionally better than most people give him credit for.

Also, you left out the part about Spielmann dying in absolute poverty....the unfortunate fate of many great chess players.

by chawil - 58 days ago
Lowestoft, Suffolk United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 370

Good game. 14... g5 looks suspect. 14... Bd6 with the idea of blockading e5 looks much more positional. It certainly prevents all that follows. Maybe there's some tactical trick that I'm missing but Black's position, while far from enviable, doesn't appear irretrievable. 15. Qh4 could be embarrassing but at least there are defensive tries.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.