Openings for Tactical Players: Göring Gambit

Submitted by GM Gserper on Sat, 11/07/2009 at 10:58pm.

The subject of today's discussion is the Göring Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4. c3!?).  Just like practically any gambit, this opening is a very dangerous weapon and since it is not particularly popular these days, most of your opponents will probably be caught by surprise. Of course it is foolish to play any opening just on the basis of surprise value, so let's see if the Göring Gambit is sound.  Of course the sheer fact that this opening was played by both Old Masters (like Adolf Andersen, Aaron Nimzowitcth, Siegbert Tarrasch), as well as by the modern Grandmasters (like Velimirovic, Sermek, Tseitlin amongst others) gives a lot of confidence. Now let's check some particular variations to learn the typical ideas of the opening.

Just like in any gambit, Black can simply reject the sacrifice here too. But in this case White gets the initiative for free as the next classical game shows.

 

Another way to defend against this gambit is pretty typical: Black tries to solve his problem by counter strike in the center (d7-d5). In this case the game becomes sharp very quickly and one mistake can be fatal.
When Black accepts the gambit by 4...dxc3, White has two options. He can sacrifice the second pawn by 5.Bc4 when the game transposes into the Danish Gambit as happened in the next game.
Another option is 5.Nxc3 where White sacrifices just one pawn but gets a long-lasting initiative which Black wasn't able to neutralize in the next game played by modern masters.
 
Of course it is impossible to analyze all the lines of such a complicated opening in just one article, so if you like it, you should do your own extensive research.
Anyway, I recommend you to give the Göring Gambit a try.  I promise you a lot of excitement!
Good luck!

» posted in Tactics
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by amitprabhale - 112 minutes ago
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 188

well thanks will try it

by pinetree - 3 hours ago
Noida India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 1

Good example,but you can mention some clear Errors !

by Precessional_Groove - 7 hours ago
Western United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 74

wow ... these were ugly games ... ...

 

... ... yeah.

by ChaozFilms - 8 hours ago
Bakersfield/ Mexico
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 152

Foolish to play an opening for surprise value alone?  At the grandmaster level perhaps.  At the level of most of us chess.com members?  Well, at this level that comment becomes foolish.

by sryiwannadraw - 9 hours ago
Austin, Texas United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 127

coool

by pjm1982 - 9 hours ago
alberta Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 30

Gserper there is a quicker win for white in game 1:

21. Rd8++ double check and mate...

Just thought I mention that...

by kitifolen - 11 hours ago
madrid Spain
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 52

nice agresive opening....i shall give it a try too!!!

thank you! nice article

by GoldenBearBW - 13 hours ago
Berkeley United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 5

nimzo's opponent resigned after move 20, so 21 and 22 are just speculative next moves by the diagrammer

by Graceclaw - 14 hours ago
Washington State United States
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 3

I don't get it....there were many opportunities in the games where there was a free piece for black. The queen after the 'solution' in the like third example?

by Kujtimi - 15 hours ago
Prishtine Kosovo
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 8

nice!

thank you!

by Whis - 15 hours ago
United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 67

I think these games would be better presented as complete games (yes I know you can hit move list and go back), but the puzzle positions are in the middle game, and don't really relate to the reader how they came about from the opening, especially if the reader is unfamiliar with the Goring Gambit.

by dmerkal - 17 hours ago
Palm Beach, Florida United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 251

In the first puzzle, 17.c5 isn't a good move because it allows for 17...Ba5+ 18.Ke2 Qf8 which allows Black to shoot White's attack in the foot.

by MostWanted147 - 17 hours ago
Ahwaz Iran
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 255

what a great opening i shall study it and give it a try.

i never memorized an opening fully by its name or its variations.

my fav was queen's gambit and king's gambit but i played queen 90% of times. and this to have their own variations in which i dont know by name by learnt them by playing and experiencing.

i think the goring Gambit is going to be the first opening that i shall study, even though i studied benko gambit/accepted/fully accepted/ indian defense variation a little, i like this goring gambit,seems exciting and i gonna study it.

THE FIRST EVER OPENING I HAVE STUDIED IN MY ENTIRE LIFE.

by satanicwarmaster - 17 hours ago
valletta Malta
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 24

Thank you GM Gesper - very instructive and enjoyable as usual Smile

by gotmilk - 18 hours ago
Las Vegas, Nevada United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 94

Yes you guys are all better than Nimzo because he "missed" a mate in 1.  :-)

If I calculated and saw a mate in 2 before a mate in 1, I'd often "miss" the mate in 1 also because as soon as I see a forced mate, I play it.

by chesspro8 - 19 hours ago
athens Greece
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 653

there is either a bug in the diagram or nimzowits missed a mate in one!!!....

sometimes we complicate things...

i can still remeber some tactics trainer puzzle whre you just win a piece in one move and the puzzles are rated 2500 or so!

by TsunamiDarts - 22 hours ago
Chicago United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 2

 An excellent article! Great examples! One question though, in the first example what was better than white's 19th move Rd1? I am a novice so I could not see it.    Thanks.

by MrFantasy - 22 hours ago
Reggio Emilia Italy
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 43

nice one

by HariBaskar - 23 hours ago
India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 3

Really, intersting one, specially for the players, who used to play scotch opening. Good surprise for their opponent.Nice and useful article.

by Henk_Van_Oosten - 23 hours ago
Twickenham Netherlands
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 30

Strikovic vs. D'Amore is indeed a good example of bad opening play by Black.  6..Nf6 looks normal, but is already the wrong plan. And later Black plays 8..Qa5? which is a waste of tempo. 8..Bb4 looks better.

The correct plan for Black is 6..Bg4 or 6..Bb4 (usually leading to a similar position). Black needs to put maximum pressure on the White centre. Usually it continues 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Be2 Bxf3 9.Bxf3 Qc4! (preventing White from castling) 10.Bxc6+ bxc 11.Qe2+ Qxe2+ 12.Kxe2 0-0-0 13.Le3 Ne7 and Black is OK. White could also try 10.Qb3 Qxb3 11.axb Nge7 but again there's no problem for Black.

So, if the Black player is not familiar with all the tactical trics after

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3 d4 exd4 4. c3!? dxc

then 4..d5 is a safe option with a simple plan.

Or perhaps have the Göring Gambit enthousiasts found something better for White?

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.