Isolated Pawn: Strong or Weak?

Submitted by Patzer24 on Mon, 11/03/2008 at 11:00pm.

Here is a game from the 2008 World Senior Championship, GM Jansa - GM Westerinen with full annotations and commentary:





This game is a clear example to dismiss the myth that isolated pawns are always weak and should be feared. In this game white willingly entered into a late middlegame with an isolated pawn but it turned out to be a strong passed pawn which posed black problems which resulted in the opponent making some mistakes to have to sacrifice material to stop the isolated passed pawn which eventually resulted in a lost game.

When we are playing out own games we should be more open minded about isolated pawns and not always fear them. Sometimes isolated pawns can be strong rather than weak and can actually pose the opponent some problems as it did in the game above.

» posted in Strategy
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by chawil - 43 days ago
Lowestoft, Suffolk United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 370

The rule is that isolated passed pawns are weak only if they can be successfully blockaded. A passed isolani can serve as a deflecting force, taking pieces away from the defence of the king in many positions. So long as the pawn can be defended  without allowing one's opponent counterplay it will always act as a potent threat, and the presence of a threat is often worse than the execution.

by kartik869 - 56 days ago
India
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1

black can b at strong in the middle but he lost the chance

by Harry07 - 58 days ago
NSW Australia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 769

Exciting finish!

by Rodgie - 58 days ago
Quezon City Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 26

Nice! A very instuctive game for an intermediate player like me.More Power!Laughing

by zukertort70 - 59 days ago
uk United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 9

This game looks very plain as if played between two average club players.  However, it's a good game for teaching basic chess principles to novices.

by transpositions - 59 days ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 160

Hi Dauntless07,

There is a big difference between a pinned piece and a trapped piece.

A pin involves 3 elements:   1. The pinning piece

                                         2. The pinned piece or pawn

                                         3. The piece, pawn, or square behind the pinned

                                            piece or pawn

A trapped piece has no square to move to where it will be directly or indirectly defended against capture on the enemy side's move.

A trapped piece or pawn involves two elements:  1. The trapping piece or pawn

                                                                        2. The trapped piece or pawn

Hopes this helps.

by EnGliSHCheSsPlAy - 1 month ago
Italy Italy
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 558

you know..it's reallly   good

by vsarun - 1 month ago
manama India
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 268

nice

by artworld - 1 month ago
downtown United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 3

who playes this ? never mind it is two gms dumb question

by motorOOhead - 2 months ago
Phoenix United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 5

To answer the question of where the bias against against isolated pawns come from I would only say that while the 'isolani' can be a plus in the middlegame , it is certainly a minus in the endgame of the average player . If you accept such a pawn you must be ready to play a very energetic middlegame . I have often seen my opponents gain space and energy with isolated d pawns only to drift to a won endgame for Black . OTOH , I have played White with isolated center pawns leading to crushing attacks (and have also gone down in flames) . It is a fun game , no?

by Dauntless07 - 2 months ago
Shepherdsville United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 40

Wow, I never thought of move 40. That was was the first time I've seen a piece pinned when it wasn't being attacked.

by HoK - 2 months ago
Brno Czech Republic
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 7

  I must agree with n213978745 - such comments are really great and helpful, each move commented even the beginning e4 :-)

 Thanks a lot for those creating these comments.

by n213978745 - 2 months ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 12

I love the comment of this game, helps me a lot!  Thanks to those who spend time to put comment on the game.

by ariveroj - 2 months ago
Madrid Spain
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 4

because if 29. ..Bxd6 30. Nb5 (as it goes) and the bishop (or the rook) is lost except because 30. ...Bxg3! is good due to the inminent mate with Rc8-c1 (it white takes d7 . I think that black probably (surely) missed this chance

by Gatsby13 - 2 months ago
Rhode Island United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 7

Why didn't black take the pawn with its bishop after 29.Nd4 ?

by ih8sens - 2 months ago
Sudbury, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1637

An isolated pawn is generally bad. ... an isolated passed pawn requires a long think :P.

 

Good game, well played, and fyi... the first 12 or more moves appear to be book ... I've seen that line on many occasion and played it myself a few times (including that "radical" 10. ... b5).

by aadaam - 2 months ago
London England
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 140

An isolated pawn is a weakness and the closer we approach the endgame the more of a weakness it is. Some openings deliberately choose to take on an isolated pawn but with compensation; more active pieces etc. Some openings take on doubled pawns but again with compensation (perhaps retaining two bishops against bishop and Knight). These pawn weaknesses are definately problematic and if an endgame is reached they could be decisive. However, in a chess game you can't expect to proceed in an ideal fashion; your opponent intends to thwart all your plans and leave your pieces ineffective. In a choice between an isolated pawn and badly placed passive pieces, the isolated pawn is the lesser of two evils.

by normajeanyates - 2 months ago
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2151

So 1.bxa7 is bad in the foll because it gives one two isolani?? And doubled, to boot??

by normajeanyates - 2 months ago
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2151

Is there such a myth? ALWAYS weak?? Most uninteresting myth, not to say false. Ditto for doubled pawns.

The annotated game is a decent one, but this is a case of an obviously strong isolano. Even I, at *that* stage, would go for it... [of course calculation dear, calculation enters into the picture also... but at corrspondence where I can move pieces around on multiple plysical boards - it is what USans call a no-brainer - the decision to enter endgame with THAT isolano.]

OTB fide game? I wont even be allowed because I need beta-blockers[1] for my hypertension - and now fide does dope-testing! [There is a recent Bill Wall article on the topic (on this site)] - beta-blockers are on the banned list!

[1] beta-1 adrenalin receptor antagionists eg propranolol, atenolol, ...

by leo8160 - 2 months ago
cairo Egypt
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 137

this is typical case of the isolated queen pawn IQP or sometimes caled the ISOLANI , its an advantage if known how to use , read Alexander Baburin "winning pawn structures" , i think also Watson mentioned the pros and cons of the isolated pawns in his mastering chess openings  book (1) , but it should be noted that its the queen's pawn that was extensively studied since it appears in many QG games, if its in another rank its a different story , it should be case by case analysis 

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.