How to beat a World Champion (Blackburne vs. Steinitz)

Submitted by FM FM_Eric_Schiller on Fri, 03/13/2009 at 1:26pm.

This exciting game features a good alternative for Black to avolid the Four Knights, but Steinitz chooses the wrong defense and gets torn apart by Blackburne. Much of the action is at f7, though the center is the main battlefield.

» posted in Strategy
 

Comments:

by pakitine - 7 months ago
Bradford vermont United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 65

Steinits had a backward knight cutting off the 8th rank.  Suppose he had played Nc8b6 instead of Qd8e8 he would have evaded the mating attack.. Then White has Qg5f6 ch , K g7H6. White has no check except to h4 which is drawish on the next move and Black has defense by Q d8 H8.  Of course if instead White played

R f1f7 x he loses the rook because pawn cannot retake because Q is undefended

Likewise if Q is on h4 after the other check because the King goes back to c7

But comments years ago called Steinits the "Drawing Master"

by kielejocain - 7 months ago
Columbus United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 87

Von Bardeleben says the internets.

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/steinitzvonbardeleben.html

Here's the game:

by meniscus - 7 months ago
Nashville United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1351

Correct. That's why Steinitz's combination against Von-What's-his-name became so famous. It was a beautiful game, but the legend has it that his opponent left the playing hall. Chess was very much an upper class male sport at the time, and several things occured (besides allowing checkmate, which is now somewhat disrepectful):

It was cowardice to decline a gambit at one point. Masters would arise and make a vocal announcement such as "I announce mate in 8" or "My oppoent is vanquished in Eight moves" or something like that, according to my teachers.

by macaoui - 7 months ago
HK Hong Kong
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 107

I think at this time it was standard practice to play until checkmate, for audience to see. Steinitz knew it was checkmate several moves before.

by obregon26 - 7 months ago
Northern Virginia United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 389

Avoiding checkmates does not require a constant level of perfection.  A true master of the game should simply avoid it.

by Sutibu - 7 months ago
Delft Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 38

well, you can't expect anyone to play on the same perfected level constantly. Everyone has their ups and downs..

by Duha - 7 months ago
Denver United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 6

I had a game that was almost exactly like that just now.  Or there were a lot of situations like this game.  But I didn't checkmate him like that the guy resigned when I put him in a position to capture his queen.  I am a low level but I hate when people just quit when they lose there queen.  I won plenty of times when they had a queen and I didn't.  Anyways that match looked like a pro was playing agaisnt me or something lol

by rjane04 - 7 months ago
Santo Domingo, Nueva Ecija Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 75

maybe steinitz is surprised and overlooked this move, most of the masters don't let their opponents to mate them. ha ha ha , good game for white

by fleiman - 7 months ago
Carmiel Israel
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 348

When this game was played Steiniz had not been WCh.

He won WCh in 1886.  After this tournament he improved his game.

This game is really weak for Black.

by obregon26 - 7 months ago
Northern Virginia United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 389

I can't believe a world champion can get checkmated like this.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.